The incident to which Mr. Ledyard is referring to may be referenced
in this
thread in the AikiWeb Forums. In summary, one 6th kyu student was
working with another 6th kyu student who seemed to want to prove to
the first that his aikido didn't "work" by giving very strong attacks
that the first student could not deal with. Please be sure to read
the original
thread for the full context.
[Discuss
this Article]
Regarding the incident in question... There are several issues here
that need to be covered separatly. First, the issue described is one
between two sixth kyus. At that level neither one of them knows enough
to be resisting each other. Uke doesn't have the ukemi required to
protect himself if nage pulls off a technique that he is
resisting. Nage doesn't know enough technique to make the adjustments
necessary to do technique against an uncooperative partner. It is
innapropriate for the seniors / Sensei to allow this at this level of
training. Neither one of them is training correctly if this is what is
taking place. Uke at this level needs to be focusing on how to take
the ukemi. His desire to take good ukemi facilitates the development
of the understanding of how a technique should be done.
Now let's make the assumption that these fellows aren't sixth kyus any
longer but more like shodans... The idea that being resistent is
somehow more honest is incorrect. It is essentially martially
unsound. One should never resist a technique since that simply creates
a suki or opening. The partner will simply change the technique or
apply the appropriate atemi. If one is striving for reality in
training from a martial standpoint one should never resist a technique
but rather reverse it. I have had partners sitting there
congratulating themselves on being able to stop my technique who were
completely open to a head butt or knee to the groin.
There was a reason that O-Sensei used the high level students as
ukes. They knew how to attack appropriately to the techniques he was
attempting to demonstrate. The idea that your technique should be
strong enough to work regardless of the manner in which the attacker
delivers his attack is silly. If that were true there would not be any
aiki. One would simply force his technique using his
strength. Actually, it doesn't matter how good you are (Shihan
included) if the other fellow knows what the technique is, he can make
the energy of his attack inappropriate for that defense. In other
words, I could do a yokomen uchi that NO ONE could do a shihonage
on.
This happens all the time in training. The Sensei demonstrates a
technique and then your partner attacks in a way in which that
techique would clearly not work. But since you are trying to do what
the Sensei did, you keep straining to make the uke fit the technique.
At a certain point in your training it's not so easy to do this to you
any more. You have enough techniques in the repertoire to shift
appropriately when the energy of the uke shifts. And you aren't so
concerned with doing exectly what the Sensei just did. That's fine for
YOUR training but the fact still remains that the uke is not training
correctly. He isn't learning anything (aside from the fact that if he
contracts his arm strongly enough to stop your shihonage he gets an
elbow in the head that he can't block).
An exception to this is training with a peer when you have a mutual
understanding that giving each other a hard time is for your mutual
benefit. It's a kind of Aiki weight lifting. Your partner supplies
resistance so that you can get stronger and then you do the same for
him. This is never done from the standpoint of showing up your partner
but rather from the desire that both of you get stronger in your
technique. You agree to resist in order to show your partner the
weaknesses in his technique and he agrees not to do the myriad atemi
that present themselves when you resist. It is important that neither
one of these people think that this resistance is anything more than a
training aid between consenting partners.
If the uke trains this way all of the time he is not learning proper
ukemi. He might get to the point at which he can take any fall you
dish out after he begins resisting but that isn't real ukemi. In a
real martial a situation you are striving to not be thrown, not
survive the throws when they occur. Real ukemi training is simply the
preparation for kaeshiwaza. You learn to move so completely in concert
with the technique that there becomes no separation between you and
the nage. Once your ukemi gets to the point at which you can stay
connected with your partner through the fastest and most complex
techniques, then in a situation requiring martial application, you can
sense any small openings in the technique of the opponent and apply a
reversal.
Kaeshiwaza is Aikido at its most martial. It is the way in which a
person perceives the suki in the partner's techique and takes full
advantage of it. While this is the real deal as far as martial
practice goes you can't have a class in which everybody is is hellbent
on making the technique the Sensei has just demonstrated impossible
for his partner. Each pair would be executing some technique or other
and no one would be practicing the actual technique the Sensei wished
to teach. This would be chaotic and dangerous.
So there is a reason that we structure our training the way we
do. Part of the structure is taking the ukemi in such a way that it
challenges the partner but doesn't defeat the technique being
practiced (unless the partner simply blows the execution). This is
taken to the point at which it is happening at full speed and
power. At this point (higher level yudansha) it is appropriate, even
necessary, to start reversing the partner if he doesn't have the
technique. This trains the proper perception and responses. But this
isn't meant to be emulated by the whole class. It is somethin that the
seniors engage in when they train with each other but is not meant to
be emulated by the whole class.
Finally, ukemi is never about showing up your partner. That kind of
ego is dangerous. Years ago I had a nemsis in the dojo who for my
first year never let me do a techique on him. He always let me know
that if he fell down it was because he was being nice, not because I
had actually thrown him. Well at one point he had to have an operation
and was gone for three or four months. I kept training steadily and
when he returned to the dojo he thought to reestablish the same
relationship we had had before. ButI had been training and was
somewwhat better at that point and he was weaker due to his
operation. We were training and I went to do a shohonage, he resisted
as usual, but this time I realized that I had it! Not pretty or
artistic but I had it. And I ripped his elbow out and put him back off
the mat. Now this guy was a very skilled yudansha and I was still a
white belt. He could have taken the ukemi at any point and been
fine. But he needed to show me he was superior and that was his
downfall. He hurt himself, I didn't do it.
That's why the type of resistance the partner decribed above was doing
is not to be encouraged. He might be able to stop you now. But he
isn't doing anything to prepare for the day when your technique has
gotten better and stronger. And on that day he will get creamed.
George S. Ledyard
Aikido Eastside
Bellevue, WA
[Discuss
this Article]
|